Improving allied health decision making to reduce readmissions

Hospital readmissions place sustained pressure on inpatient services and are frequently influenced by modifiable factors, including how patients are identified for targeted allied health input. Observational studies have shown that higher hospital investment in occupational therapy is associated with lower readmission rates, indicating that allied health decision making contributes to reducing avoidable returns to hospital.  National workforce reviews have also highlighted that enabling clinicians to work at full scope of practice improves resource use and service efficiency within constrained systems.

In this context, Lauren Nichols, a senior occupational therapist at St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne and Western Health, examined how allied health teams identify patients at highest risk of avoidable readmission and whether participation based outcome measures could support more consistent, higher value clinical decision making.

The first stage of the study mapped barriers and facilitators to change across the occupational therapy team. Staff recognised the value of change and reported strong peer support, while limited time, high referral volumes, and discomfort with withdrawing from low value activity influenced practice. These findings informed a second stage evaluating targeted interventions to increase use of a participation based outcome measure and assess its potential to identify patients at highest risk of readmission.

Nichols, Lauren - Identifying barriers and facilitators to outcome measure use in occupational therapy

Linking local improvement efforts to system learning: reflections from the International Forum

Presenting her work at the International Forum on Quality and Safety in Healthcare in Canberra, Australia, broadened Nichols’ perspective on how local improvement efforts connect to wider systems change. The Forum was her first quality and safety meeting, and it exposed her to shared challenges across disciplines, sectors and countries.

Nichols described the immediate effect of the opening plenary:

“It talked about that tiny iteration and how you work towards a bigger picture. It definitely triggered in me what the bigger picture might look like outside of my setting.”

 The Forum gave Nichols networking opportunities to meet associates also working on workforce pressures, behaviour change and service redesign. Conversations on burnout, daily huddles and small scale iterative problem solving were particularly influential. These discussions strengthened her thinking on scalability and how similar diagnostic behaviour change strategies may translate across hospital and community settings.

Nichols is completing the second stage of the project, which focuses on increasing uptake of participation based outcome measures to establish a consistent dataset across teams. This phase aims to address behavioural and organisational barriers to routine use, recognising that reliable data are a prerequisite for further analytical work.

Future phases will explore whether aggregated outcome measure data could support the development of a predictive score to inform safer and more consistent patient selection across services with finite resources. Cross site collaboration is being considered to assess the feasibility and transferability of this approach beyond a single setting.
 

Coming to the Forum has created some connections outside of just occupational therapy… I have had the opportunity to talk about where this sits outside of occupational therapy with leaders in health care and other disciplines as well.

Lauren Nichols
Senior occupational therapist, St Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne and Western Health, Australia

Nichols’ findings have implications for allied health services operating under sustained demand and constrained staffing. More consistent use of participation based outcome measures may support safer patient selection, reduce low value activity, and enable clinicians to direct time and expertise towards patients at greatest risk of avoidable readmission. This approach aligns with national workforce priorities that emphasise full scope practice as a mechanism to improve efficiency and care quality.

The work is also relevant to broader workforce redesign efforts. By addressing behavioural and organisational barriers to practice change, the project illustrates how allied health teams can be supported to adopt higher value models of care without additional resources. Similar diagnostic and intervention strategies may be applicable across disciplines where clinical prioritisation and demand management remain persistent challenges.
Although undertaken in acute hospital settings, the principles underpinning the work are likely to be transferable to community and subacute services facing comparable pressures. Further evaluation across sites may clarify whether participation based outcome measures can provide a scalable method for supporting consistent decision making across diverse health care contexts.
Delivering better emergency care communication for culturally and linguistically diverse patients
Go to Top